Dear Mr. Zuckerberg,
As you are probably aware, Ukraine is currently faced with a war ignited by Russia in its eastern regions. Russia supplies weapons and troops to its proxies who kill Ukrainians at their own soil. A year ago Russia annexed Crimea, a part of Ukraine that makes around 4% of its territory. It's like Maine, South Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware and Rhode Island being seized by Russia in one go.
You should also be aware that the war Russia is waging in East Ukraine is often called a hybrid war where information and propaganda matter more than weapons. Of all the instruments to share information (or disinformation for that matter) among people, social media is known to be the most potent one.
Mr. Zuckerberg, Please Dont Let Facebook Turn into KGBookYou may also be well aware of the Revolution of Dignity that embraced Ukraine last year and inspired millions to raise against Russia-backed authoritarian regime of the then President Yanukovych. For four long winter months people of Ukraine stood up to fight for their future and democratic values shared and cherished by the rest of the civilized world. Over 100 unarmed Ukrainian protesters were killed in Kyiv in those days.
The oppressive regime ultimately fell. Many believe it happened thanks, among other things, to Facebook and Twitter, which had become powerful tools in the fight for freedom, so powerful many claim it wouldn't be possible without them.
For Ukrainian audience, Facebook has always been a platform where truth can be sought for and found, thoughts shared and discussed and many moves of civil society coordinated.
Last several months, however, the situation has radically changed to its opposite. Facebook has lost its well-deserved status of a place of freedom for Ukrainians.
While 2013 through 2014 just a handful, 5 to 7 Ukrainian public figures were ever blocked, now it is an ongoing flow. Tens of accounts of civil activists, politicians, journalists and even media outlets are being suspended on a daily basis.
A few last week's examples to illustrate.
An account of Hennady Moskal, a governor in Luhansk, area with the ongoing war, partly occupied by Russia-backed terrorists, was blocked. For Mr Moskal and his thousands of followers, Facebook was a precious tools to share breaking news on the situation in the region, lives of common people, and activities of both Ukrainian forces and the aggressor.
An account of Oleh Lyashko, leader of the third largest parliament party was also blocked.
Page of watcher.com.ua, a popular web portal engaged in analyzing propaganda on the web was permanently deleted.
An account of Andriy Bondar, a popular Ukrainian poet, columnist and activist, was blocked.
An account of Vakhtang Kipiani, a prominent public figure and editor-in-chief of Istorychna Pravda, a popular website was blocked.
An account of Igor Mosiychuk, a Ukrainian MP, was also blocked.
Also blocked within just last week were accounts of several other popular figures and activists.
Why could this happen? We believe the cause is simple. FB has a set of formal rules any violation of which could lead to blocking. If an organized group of users starts sending complaints against a particular user or his/her posts, the decision-making mechanism may fail. Formally, such group, if unidentified as such, acts in full compliance with the rules of FB, while, in fact, they abuse the rules. A person responsible for taking a decision to block or reject the complaint sees an avalanche of complaints citing would-be legitimate reasons for reporting. In many cases, it works. If number of similar complaints reaches some point, the user is blocked. We believe this is exactly the tactics used by the infamous Russia's troll factories against Ukrainian civil society to silence its voice.
To illustrate more, the above mentioned Andriy Bondar was blocked for a post where he merely mentioned that another person had also been blocked.